methods
How
the information you have found is ...
•Sourced
•Collected
•Collated
•Presented
Refer
back to previous lectures that have emphasised
the importance of evidence
You
need to clearly evidence why you selected these methods of gathering
information and selecting evidence and why they are the most
appropriate for
your study...
This
will make you appear to be in control and aware of what you are doing...
methodology - A
systematic way of sifting through information to get to the
point - occur in an introduction
dictionary definition:
•meth·od·ol·o·gy
•noun,
plural
-gies. 1. a set or
system
of methods, principles, and rules for regulating
a given discipline, as in the arts or sciences.
•2.
Philosophy . a. the underlying
principles and rules of organization of
a philosophical
system or inquiry procedure.
•b.
the study of the
principles underlying the organization of the various sciences
and the conduct of scientific inquiry.
•3.
Education . a branch of
pedagogics dealing with analysis and evaluation of subjects
to be taught and of the methods of teaching
them.
To describe and analyse…
methods, throwing light on their limitations and resources, clarifying their
suppositions and consequences,
relating their potentialities to the twilight
zone at the frontiers of knowledge… (Kaplan, 1973:93)
It is not that we must somehow ‘please’
our critical colleague audiences; the deeper issue is to avoid self delusion.
After that we can
turn to the task about how we did study, and what worried us
about its quality. Without such methodological frankness, we run the
risk of
reporting ‘knowledge that ain’t so’.
(Miles & Huberman,
1994:294)
theories
These
can help
you decide upon the methods you use
Alternatively
the material you find may suggest the appropriate theories
•the·o·ry
•noun,
plural
the·o·ries. 1. a coherent
group of tested general propositions, commonly regarded
as correct, that
can be used as
principles of explanation and
prediction for a class of phenomena: Einstein's
theory
of
relativity.
Synonyms:
principle, law, doctrine.
•2.
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to
experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions
that are regarded
as reporting matters of actual fact. Synonyms: idea, notion
hypothesis, postulate. Antonyms: practice, verification,
corroboration, substantiation.
•3.
Mathematics . a body of principles,
theorems, or the like, belonging to one subject: number theory.
•4.
the branch of a science or art that
deals
with its principles or methods, as distinguished from its practice:
music theory.
•5.
a particular conception or view of something
to be done or of the method of doing it; a system of rules
or principles: conflicting
theories of how children best learn to
read.
Choose at least one key theory that
relates to the material you are looking at...
Examples
of theories often used by students:
•Psychological-
S.Freud; C.Jung; J.Lacan; L.Mulvey etc.
•Communication
theory- J.Fiske,
etc.
•Postcolonialism-
Spivak,
Said, Bhabha etc.
•Social
History of Art- T.J.Clarke, J.Berger
etc.
•Marxism
/ Post-Marxism- Frankfurt School
•Gender
Studies / Feminist- G.Pollock; L.Nochlin
action research
important
Choose
the Theories and Methods most appropriate to your subject
one_methods, two_theory, three_application
1. Make decisions about how to collect and order information
2. Choose a relevant theoretical stand point
3. Apply these to your study
4. Explicitly outline this in the introduction. Address suggested failings in the conclusion.
dictionary definition
•‘Critical’
–from the Greek word Kreinein, meaning
‘to
separate’ or ‘to choose’
•Skepticism
•Reasoned
Thinking
–‘Stepping away’ and using evidence and
logic to come to your conclusions
finding ways to disprove hypothesis and left with 'truth' being critical, the opposite of being emotive or suggestive informed body of
research with a critical approach
some perspectives that you might adopt or consider
finding ways to disprove hypothesis and left with 'truth' being critical, the opposite of being emotive or suggestive informed body of
research with a critical approach
some perspectives that you might adopt or consider
•Marxist
•Neoliberal
•Sociological
•Psychological
•Postmodernist
•Technological
•Fundamentalist
•Positivist...
say something with conviction and bias and back it up with loads of research, if you don't agree with something then don't
pay 'lip service' to something you think is wrong...make everything clear in the methodology different approaches lead to
different results.
Where was the
author/artist/designer/photographer situated?
Try
to consider different points of view...where
the creator was coming from intellectually; emotionally; philosophically,
politically…
being critical is about interrogating the sources that you're using.
where are you coming from, you're particular take on things
where am I coming from? How
is my choice of topic influenced by my emotions; aspirations; context?
context is everything
Consider
the influence of one or more of the following:
the
time; place; society; politics; economics; technology; philosophy; scientific
thought....
everything you look at, case studies of whatever- how does the time and place affect its meaning how did political issues affect this...
changes/development in society....how do they all relate or inform what you're looking at, what and why was the designer making?
how does this relate to other stuff going on?
critical analysis
as you're writing, don't just make points, always back up with evidence, evidence could be quotes, empirical, data from surveys etc.
evidence
what is the evidence for what you're saying? Could you find more evidence to support your conclusion?
always try and find more than one source to support conclusions
EVIDENCE
REASONED ANALYSIS OF EVIDENCE
LOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF THAT EVIDENCE
A COHERENT ARGUMENT
think about an argument that progresses
argument - what do you want to say?
have I got the evidence to back it up?
where else do I need to look in order to find more evidence?
evidence that you have looked at more than one source and can find an answer within a multitude of theories
assess a number of different takes on one topic
and then find you're stance on it
triangulation
Pitting
alternative theories against the same body of data
a clear logical plan
Keep
it simple- refine what you want to say and focus on a few key issue
Look
into your key issues in depth and
bring in the maximum evidence in to support your views
Discuss
your issues and the evidence you have found in a clear and logical manner
Move
from the general to the specific
evaluation
You
need to show the reader that you are evaluating the evidence for its relevance
and reliability
Evaluation=
Looking at and coming to conclusions about the value of your evidence
critical analysis of a text step by step
Step
one
Identify
an aspect of your specialist subject that you would like to explore.
Step
two
Select
a writer or theorist and a particular piece of writing about your specialist
subject.
Step
three
Make notes
that Identify the key points in the writing.
Step
four
What
evidence is used to support or 'prove' the key
points'.
Step
five
Is
it convincing?
What
else needs to be said in order to 'prove' the key points?
Step
six
Write
a response to the piece of writing and comment on:
the
implications for your work; do you agree/ disagree with what has been said ?
Does it help to support your views/ argument?
the
thoughts you have had as the result of reading this piece;
on
the evidence used by the writer.
visual analysis, step by step
The
following prompts could be used when analysing a piece of visual work:
Look
at and comment upon the significance of the use of...
Line;
Colour; Tone; Texture; Form; Composition; etc.
How
are these related to the function of, or ‘message’ communicated by, the piece?
How
are they related to context; media and materials available ;technology;
attitudes prevalent at the time the work was made?
What
evidence do you have to support your conclusions?
No comments:
Post a Comment